From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990204072619.ZM16318@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 07:26:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <9902041412.AA37396@ibmth.df.unipi.it> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: PATCH: zsh-3.1.5-pws-6: bash-style completion" (Feb 4, 3:12pm) References: <9902041412.AA37396@ibmth.df.unipi.it> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: zsh-3.1.5-pws-6: bash-style completion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailing-List: 5238 On Feb 4, 3:12pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: PATCH: zsh-3.1.5-pws-6: bash-style completion } } However, I'm having problems with LISTAMBIGUOUS when RECEXACT is set, } because `am' then gets set a few lines above that, apparently even if } there isn't an exact completion, and the chunk in question is skipped. Ah, yes, that's Sven's patch from zsh-workers/4148. Previously when an ambigous prefix partially-completed to an exact prefix, the next TAB would simply accept that rather than proceeding into AUTOMENU. After 4148, zsh "remembers" that the prefix was produced by completion, not by having been typed, and therefore treats it as still ambiguous. } Any ideas? Perhaps it just needs to read am = !isset(BASHAUTOLIST); instead of am = 1; -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com