From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 492 invoked from network); 1 Mar 1999 16:29:44 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Mar 1999 16:29:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 20022 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 1999 16:29:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5589 Received: (qmail 19993 invoked from network); 1 Mar 1999 16:29:20 -0000 Message-Id: <9903011613.AA62558@ibmth.df.unipi.it> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Don't understand compadd -p (or -P) any more Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:13:23 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson I thought I'd got this worked out, so maybe it's a bug. % _foo() { compadd -p pref/ bar rod; } % compdef _foo foo % foo pref/ # nothing % foo bar rod and the choices on the line do have the correct prefix. In other words, if there's a pre-existing prefix there, it doesn't recognise it. Now it seems -P is doing the same thing. Has the behaviour changed in some way I don't understand? -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy