From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14147 invoked from network); 14 Mar 1999 20:33:58 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Mar 1999 20:33:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 12930 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 1999 20:33:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5790 Received: (qmail 12923 invoked from network); 14 Mar 1999 20:33:43 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990314123251.ZM10979@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 12:32:50 -0800 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to mason@primenet.com.au (Geoff Wing) "Possible Bug: 3.1.5-pws-11: compinit" (Mar 14, 3:28pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: mason@primenet.com.au, zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Possible Bug: 3.1.5-pws-11: compinit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 14, 3:28pm, Geoff Wing wrote: } Subject: Possible Bug: 3.1.5-pws-11: compinit } } [[ -s ~/fbin/zsh/compinit ]] && . ~/fbin/zsh/compinit } too early in my /etc/zshrc then completion won't work. e.g. } % echo $ZSH_ # fails } } I had it after autoloading of all $fpath stuff, but before } setopt, bindkey, ulimit, umask I can't reproduce this one in pws-12 either. It behaves differently after the unsetopt you quoted, but not (that I can tell) after only the setopt, and it doesn't fail in either case. } Are any of these supposed to influence it in any way? Bindkey might if you rebind TAB, C-d, ESC TAB, or ESC C-d. Which you did't. The setopts shouldn't (and don't, as far as I can tell). -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com