From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17387 invoked from network); 27 Apr 1999 16:29:17 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Apr 1999 16:29:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 1498 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 1999 16:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6125 Received: (qmail 1483 invoked from network); 27 Apr 1999 16:28:50 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990427092450.ZM25373@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 09:24:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <199904262252.HAA00691@pop1.ngy.3web.ne.jp> Comments: In reply to Tatsuo Furukawa "Re: Patch available for 3.0.6-pre-0" (Apr 27, 12:22am) References: <199904262252.HAA00691@pop1.ngy.3web.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Tatsuo Furukawa Subject: Re: Patch available for 3.0.6-pre-0 Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 27, 12:22am, Tatsuo Furukawa wrote: } Subject: Re: Patch available for 3.0.6-pre-0 } } Geoff> It's against virgin 3.0.5 sources. } } Now, the newest is 3.0.6-pre-1. So, I made Geoff's patch againt } 3.0.6-pre-1 version. I hope that it will help reducing maintainer's } work. Thanks; normally it would have, but in this particular case I was already maintaining three parallel CVS sandboxes to track overlapping patches, so I'd already taken care of this with a merge. Hold on to the thought for next time, though. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com