Re: Somewhere between modules-bltn and zmodload ....

["Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@brasslantern.com>]

On Apr 30, 10:56am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: Re: Somewhere between modules-bltn and zmodload ....
}
} > Maybe this is possible and I've just missed it.
} > 
} > Why is there no compile-time option equivalent to runtime "zmodload -a ..."?
} 
} Just add it to xmods.conf.

Ah, OK ... and duh.

} (I don't understand this name, btw.)

I think the x is for "extension."  (But why isn't modules-bltn called
"bmods.conf" or something?  Maybe we should clean all this up, too.)

Here's another question:

zagzig% zmodload -ac  
post after (compctl)
post between (compctl)
post suffix (compctl)
post prefix (compctl)
zagzig% zmodload -uc compctl after
zmodload: compctl: no such condition
zagzig% zmodload -ac
post between (compctl)
post suffix (compctl)
post prefix (compctl)
zagzig% zmodload -uc compctl between || echo Failed
zmodload: compctl: no such condition
Failed
zagzig% zmodload -ac
post suffix (compctl)
post prefix (compctl)

Is is really the right behavior that zmodload go on and unload the rest
of the conditions listed on the command line after one has failed?  Or
should it stop when it gets to a failure?  I suppose the analogy is to
"rm", but I was a bit surprised by it.

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com