From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20407 invoked from network); 30 Apr 1999 18:21:58 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Apr 1999 18:21:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 25533 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 1999 18:21:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6177 Received: (qmail 25524 invoked from network); 30 Apr 1999 18:21:33 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990430111959.ZM18267@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:19:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <199904300856.KAA21857@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: Somewhere between modules-bltn and zmodload ...." (Apr 30, 10:56am) References: <199904300856.KAA21857@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Somewhere between modules-bltn and zmodload .... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 30, 10:56am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: Somewhere between modules-bltn and zmodload .... } } > Maybe this is possible and I've just missed it. } > } > Why is there no compile-time option equivalent to runtime "zmodload -a ..."? } } Just add it to xmods.conf. Ah, OK ... and duh. } (I don't understand this name, btw.) I think the x is for "extension." (But why isn't modules-bltn called "bmods.conf" or something? Maybe we should clean all this up, too.) Here's another question: zagzig% zmodload -ac post after (compctl) post between (compctl) post suffix (compctl) post prefix (compctl) zagzig% zmodload -uc compctl after zmodload: compctl: no such condition zagzig% zmodload -ac post between (compctl) post suffix (compctl) post prefix (compctl) zagzig% zmodload -uc compctl between || echo Failed zmodload: compctl: no such condition Failed zagzig% zmodload -ac post suffix (compctl) post prefix (compctl) Is is really the right behavior that zmodload go on and unload the rest of the conditions listed on the command line after one has failed? Or should it stop when it gets to a failure? I suppose the analogy is to "rm", but I was a bit surprised by it. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com