From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2020 invoked from network); 31 May 1999 07:55:59 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 31 May 1999 07:55:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6151 invoked by alias); 31 May 1999 07:55:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6377 Received: (qmail 6144 invoked from network); 31 May 1999 07:55:39 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990531075529.ZM4297@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 07:55:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <000501beab39$4ff45210$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> Comments: In reply to "Andrej Borsenkow" "RE: pws-19 + all patches: config.h unconditionally recreated by config.status" (May 31, 11:43am) References: <000501beab39$4ff45210$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: "Andrej Borsenkow" , "ZSH workers mailing list" Subject: Re: pws-19 + all patches: config.h unconditionally recreated by config.status MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 31, 11:43am, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } Subject: RE: pws-19 + all patches: config.h unconditionally recreated by c } } Is it possible, that } autoconf version makes a difference? I have here autoconf-2.13. Yes, that's certainly possible, in fact even likely. I've got 2.12. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com