From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12259 invoked from network); 15 Jun 1999 04:48:54 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Jun 1999 04:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 22701 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 1999 04:48:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6632 Received: (qmail 22694 invoked from network); 15 Jun 1999 04:48:37 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990615044833.ZM22955@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:48:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <990615032530.ZM22785@candle.brasslantern.com> Comments: In reply to "Bart Schaefer" "Recent 64-bit patches and 3.0.6" (Jun 15, 3:25am) References: <990615032530.ZM22785@candle.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Recent 64-bit patches and 3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 15, 3:25am, Bart Schaefer wrote: } Subject: Recent 64-bit patches and 3.0.6 } } Should any or all of 6552 6570 6571 6626 be applied/adapted to 3.0.6 ? ^^^^ Sorry, I meant 6563 here; 6570 says something about keeping 3.0.6 in sync. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com