From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13881 invoked from network); 15 Jun 1999 08:25:51 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Jun 1999 08:25:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 4434 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 1999 08:25:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6634 Received: (qmail 4424 invoked from network); 15 Jun 1999 08:25:28 -0000 Message-Id: <9906150756.AA30169@ibmth.df.unipi.it> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Recent 64-bit patches and 3.0.6 In-Reply-To: ""Bart Schaefer""'s message of "Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:48:33 DFT." <990615044833.ZM22955@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 09:56:05 +0200 From: Peter Stephenson "Bart Schaefer" wrote: > On Jun 15, 3:25am, Bart Schaefer wrote: > } Subject: Recent 64-bit patches and 3.0.6 > } > } Should any or all of 6552 6570 6571 6626 be applied/adapted to 3.0.6 ? > ^^^^ > Sorry, I meant 6563 here; 6570 says > something about keeping 3.0.6 in sync. You'll need 6552 for 6570 to work. Any applicable parts of 6563 are sensible to apply; 6571 is a good idea in any case, assuming the rlim_t handling is similar which I haven't checked; 6626 looks to be pretty vital to get stuff with 8-byte alignment to work with --enable-zsh-mem in general. -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy