From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22429 invoked from network); 2 Aug 1999 08:19:42 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Aug 1999 08:19:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 19444 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 1999 08:19:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7338 Received: (qmail 19437 invoked from network); 2 Aug 1999 08:19:30 -0000 Message-Id: <9908020748.AA12937@ibmth.df.unipi.it> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: contribution: 'address' database as zsh script In-Reply-To: "Geoff Wing"'s message of "02 Aug 1999 05:40:50 NFT." Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 09:48:28 +0200 From: Peter Stephenson Geoff Wing wrote: > Bart Schaefer typed: > :On Aug 2, 5:44am, Dominik Vogt wrote: > :} Subject: contribution: 'address' database as zsh script > :} here is the script I want to contribute as I mentioned [...] > :} # Due to a bug in the getopts builtin in zsh 3.0.5 all command line opti > ons > :} # with a leading '+' do not work. Use the corresponding options with > :} # beginning with '-' instead. > :Good grief. Why didn't you mention this BEFORE 3.0.6 was released? > :The patch in zsh-workers/3590 applies cleanly to 3.0.6 and fixes this bug. > > Wow. 3590. Talk about lost patches :-) > From: Peter Stephenson > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 13:41:19 +0100 > In-reply-to: "Colm Buckley"'s ... "Mon, 30 Dec 1996 12:59:14 MET." 3.1 seems to have had this fixed a different way: at least, the code is different and the bug didn't show up. I've added the script to the contributions at the web site. They could still do with some better indexing, since it's hard to find out what's there. -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy