From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2318 invoked from network); 5 Aug 1999 16:21:15 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 5 Aug 1999 16:21:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 2675 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 1999 16:21:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7384 Received: (qmail 2663 invoked from network); 5 Aug 1999 16:21:00 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990805162056.ZM16550@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 16:20:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: <199908051219.OAA16988@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "PATCH: parameter and quoting (was: Re: Completion problems.)" (Aug 5, 2:19pm) References: <199908051219.OAA16988@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: parameter and quoting (was: Re: Completion problems.) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Aug 5, 2:19pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: PATCH: parameter and quoting (was: Re: Completion problems.) } } } Bart Schaefer wrote: } } > On Aug 4, 11:37am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } > } > I think (2) would be quite useful in other contexts anyway. Perhaps (Q)? } > (And we could add (q) which means the same as :q, just for completeness.) } } The patch below tries to do that in the simplest way I could think of. Hrm. One problem which may not even be worth mentioning is that ${(Qq)param} acts like ${(q)param} and ${(qQ)param} acts like ${(Q)param} whereas other "inversions" like using (j///s///) always both happen and always happen in the same order regardless of the order in which the flags appear. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com