From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20794 invoked from network); 6 Aug 1999 15:16:21 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Aug 1999 15:16:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 24359 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 1999 15:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7388 Received: (qmail 24352 invoked from network); 6 Aug 1999 15:16:06 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990806151601.ZM18114@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 15:16:01 +0000 In-Reply-To: <199908060743.JAA17890@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Ahem" (Aug 6, 9:43am) References: <199908060743.JAA17890@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Ahem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Aug 6, 9:43am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Ahem } } And Peter's entry is thought as an example of British understatement, } right? (And should probably be the first one, considering the -pws-<-> } releases without which we wouldn't have got so far.) I sort of figured they were order-independent, and just updated the text a bit in the 3.0.6 file. You're right about understatement, though. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com