From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28804 invoked from network); 30 Aug 1999 14:20:33 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Aug 1999 14:20:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 2055 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 1999 14:18:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7544 Received: (qmail 2048 invoked from network); 30 Aug 1999 14:18:21 -0000 Message-Id: <9908301317.AA15995@ibmth.df.unipi.it> To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: Files modified after a given date In-Reply-To: "Sven Wischnowsky"'s message of "Thu, 26 Aug 1999 13:35:54 DFT." <199908261135.NAA15733@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:17:52 +0200 From: Peter Stephenson Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > The patch would be something like the one below. It allows `*(e:string:)' > with `$_' being the filename. `reply' and `REPLY' are still used. do we really need both (at least with all the current complexity)? how about calling it with ' $_' at the end if it's a single word with no metacharacters, or something? -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy