From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3147 invoked from network); 8 Sep 1999 22:30:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Sep 1999 22:30:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 18063 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 1999 22:30:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7731 Received: (qmail 18056 invoked from network); 8 Sep 1999 22:30:16 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990908223009.ZM13764@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 22:30:09 +0000 In-Reply-To: <005c01befa35$40dba620$1e73e3a5@dell450> Comments: In reply to "Wayne Davison" "Re: BK & CVS (slightly off-topic)" (Sep 8, 1:03pm) References: <990907162927.ZM32134@candle.brasslantern.com> <199909080900.LAA08747@paris.ifh.de> <19990908114038.B20503@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> <19990908154421.A18378@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> <990908172610.ZM13625@candle.brasslantern.com> <005c01befa35$40dba620$1e73e3a5@dell450> X-Mailer: Z-Mail Lite (5.0.0 30July97) To: "Zsh hackers list" Subject: Re: BK & CVS (slightly off-topic) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 8, 1:03pm, Wayne Davison wrote: > Subject: Re: BK & CVS (slightly off-topic) > One thing we may wish to do is to hold off on a decision to use CVS for the > public archive until the BitKeeper 1.0 release occurs I had been meaning to mention BK myself, but I also have no direct experience with it. > It will be free to use for Open Source development. Last I heard, it was to be free for any kind of development as long as you are willing to publish your commit logs. I'm not entirely thrilled with BK's license, but it seems it'd be OK for zsh work.