From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25492 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 14:21:10 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Oct 1999 14:21:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 12046 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 1999 14:21:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8161 Received: (qmail 12039 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 14:21:02 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <991007141959.ZM26920@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 14:19:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <19991007142931.D19339@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Comments: In reply to Adam Spiers "bashprompt license (was Re: PATCH: prompt fun)" (Oct 7, 2:29pm) References: <19991006215809.A12344@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> <19991007142931.D19339@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: bashprompt license (was Re: PATCH: prompt fun) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 7, 2:29pm, Adam Spiers wrote: } Subject: bashprompt license (was Re: PATCH: prompt fun) } } Just got email from the bashprompt guy saying that there's no license } on it at all and we're free to use it in any way we wish. That should be fine as is, then; make a note of that somewhere (maybe add a Functions/README.prompts file?). If they ever do get under a GPL style license, all we have to do is stop copying them into the dist and make people grab & convert them with the perl program. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com