From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24334 invoked from network); 3 Dec 1999 15:24:13 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Dec 1999 15:24:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 14394 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 1999 15:24:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8878 Received: (qmail 14387 invoked from network); 3 Dec 1999 15:24:06 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <991203152402.ZM18088@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 15:24:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: <199912031313.OAA00670@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "PATCH: better control for _cd" (Dec 3, 2:13pm) References: <199912031313.OAA00670@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: better control for _cd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Dec 3, 2:13pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: PATCH: better control for _cd } } This makes _cd use the tags local-directories and path-directories to } decide if those in the cwd and/or those in $cdpath should be } completed. Is that really a good idea? In the event that the same name can be resolved either way, "cd" is always going to change to the same one. Seeing completions only for one or the other case would be misleading. This is one case where I think it should always complete them all and always order the groups the way that "cd" is going to choose them (that is, local directories first). -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com