From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4725 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2010 17:20:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 28273 Received: (qmail 10170 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2010 17:20:01 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5J+WUbEiaHkA4KzUPLz/kIhIsScSGStFLW7yMasdjnk=; b=NDATz7ACsE1fTJsxAcr/l6ImOTSAZewJaREozYGUKGk+8vTkxZCAjYpTTEMDUtFF+T IYiarK9BPcvKwwZvm48JMsxpEifHxhbXGItEActm1mxnmKDYCYg/6IqENUMSQZ2s+2+3 wmfKbPeXZY1CYLqboGLkLrDATaZMJQ/2ePAh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=IKRswLOLJFAVp+3uVcxZZTCCH9FubtrcuUjnSQSgo81L4tJYf7PUUdkjo7iqJORHpm tOlhR8XeRFnlxEHXnRdqrV9prH5/PO/WaeP6wDJRhaAbAdO53RNYbfvB9VsB9T6papfQ aK2huiKMURwk9MQYJi6XtqIDEX0WbTxwzSY+Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100913172320.GA17915@scru.org> References: <20100913172320.GA17915@scru.org> From: Richard Hartmann Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 19:19:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: notmuch zsh completion To: Clint Adams Cc: ingmar@exherbo.org, 578707@bugs.debian.org, zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 19:23, Clint Adams wrote: > Would you mind if the notmuch completion function you wrote was > incorporated upstream in zsh? I poked him and he does not mind. He should reply to this email when he can access this particular email address again, as well. Richard