From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28535-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 24083 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2010 17:57:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28535
Received: (qmail 14496 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 17:57:07 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.216.178 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=Ap7FF2vWh3ulOQR8YCEdwG9G/R4JdRrAaLAAnaeN+64=;
        b=v2L9CSjTmFnPsZamVTNUDMiyB4KVM7A6LTV5FrvjGzm4oJKgxsXjeT5THA9RCb+L6t
         j9XDnlseazcsfY3RBh7OIEG8LJ9D82E/8UZrR7NWGCu4MIYQqsxSBe27gvMPM9mozpcJ
         SOPAmgpyTtcd9zW3pK8MRlFCW0TrGDQ9wIQUg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=wkqD24pmocPoONBey1I+NZD7lXNBDAjkvWE+MPidzsVrn6MZCIQw5MvihHHDgoSP05
         ukT1eGzCVM/O+8FDSiUc7ZGnUKvXdEu62x5XkX7Ugrkup9Q5ky5EPpoqLuPzk+Ou994g
         uifPwUpFVO5x+Ulo4fHSmQprpZkMJPHkyiIQg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20101217171253.443dc65c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
References: <27627.1292500716@csr.com>
	<20101217130335.GA12154@ruderich.org>
	<AANLkTimBSM77GUg7vJm4Oed1iGSZOKgW5YN3qAcTju9V@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101217171253.443dc65c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:50:40 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikmwiUgOd12Wytk6x3fD0puy9i7asLmKZjSj9AR@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: zsh 4.3.10-test-3
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 17 December 2010 18:12, Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:35:24 -0800
> Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Simon Ruderich <simon@ruderich.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Could the default get changed back to the old behaviour with causes
>> > no highlight (in bold)?
>> >
>>
>> I think the suffix highlighting makes a nice default, since it helps
>> to show people that the character is nebulous, and may disappear.
>> Many people who are new to zsh get surprised by the automatic
>> trimming of a visible slash, and having an easy way for someone to
>> see that that slash is going to disappear (or not disappear) when
>> return is pressed is a good thing, in my opinion.
>
> Yes, the intention that anyone worried by that sort of thing is likely
> to be able to do what Mikael suggested to turn off everything, so the
> fix should be good enough.

+zle_highlight also control highlighting of a removable completion
+suffix, e.g. the "/" automatically appended to directories.  This uses
+the keyword "suffix".

"also controls"

-		    isearch_atr_on_set = 1;
+		    isearch_atr_on_set = suffix_atr_on-set = 1;

_set, not -set

-- 
Mikael Magnusson