From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28027-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 13984 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2010 22:30:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28027
Received: (qmail 8878 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2010 22:30:29 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.214.43 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=ieHQDsrZDE/RFgF4v3ZiLyOpBX7FDy4ktwkOuK7GwiQ=;
        b=DNO5HQ2SQTrkYZQXrdwqEVaweHaJos197z7yIUOGJYM5lfOS8J967DKNCgAx9oDXkd
         DDFnGd3pZOPyIm93zs7hj8eUlrDPhle0QU4K8JdmiXOpTrglNOQatyEPAVPGwAE7v/Jk
         na0u3Pk4pBABYy8HtuJ47KoY1z9jzTOfsWhdM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=D0blPVwSxKBSqhr0FSKNZBLNQKM57SuEDEE+M+WbivUmTuteOA2DLSHuSa/kSsRPUJ
         OrEOx4GSO/GpW6PpyGxsiBP3OSZ7gKemUlxI1DFSWtsnHQ/+xFrQiB0MPjeUfvtr5cwK
         0Y2AHruzAEIElc9xYR+IsyvGh6n/msiLUaV+M=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8073.1276294725@pws-pc>
References: <8073.1276294725@pws-pc>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 00:30:24 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTilJ-Qdey0zMZ4D0j7NfmDGqaUOTg1Mac0VzmuSx@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: dynamic directory name completion
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 12 June 2010 00:18, Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> I've been playing around with dynamic directory names for referring to
> recently used directories and in the process realised that rather than
> having to overload _dynamic_directory_name in order to complete dynamic
> directory names it would be much more natural to call the original
> function, zsh_directory_name, with a new code letter.  You don't lose
> anything at all by this---you can still overload _dynamic_directory_name
> if you prefer.
>
> Here's the change with a tested (but rather less useful than the code
> I'm aiming at) example.
>
> Index: Doc/Zsh/expn.yo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/Doc/Zsh/expn.yo,v
> retrieving revision 1.115
> diff -p -u -r1.115 expn.yo
> --- Doc/Zsh/expn.yo     11 Jun 2010 20:08:02 -0000      1.115
> +++ Doc/Zsh/expn.yo     11 Jun 2010 22:12:37 -0000
> @@ -1451,6 +1451,12 @@ parts of the directory path, as describe
>  length matched (16 in the example) is longer than that matched by any
>  static name.
>
> +The completion system calls `tt(zsh_directory_name c)' in order to
> +completion dynamic names for directories.  The code for this should be

completion -> complete