From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17775 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2010 22:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 28322 Received: (qmail 18698 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 22:04:26 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NaobyQ35P/tTF1bQuXWK/V0D7wa9opmWA5mKfhq8eFo=; b=FryJpxv5L5TBtZ8IUwiEO90I+EyFXsjYBj4dr0VQ+iOWpxiMaxn4q9eB9Rtg6/3Ipk 1TAKgqPg/K0A7eLegT2PMkYnD3L82yH+3V5x+UEhMI4LgVr4u+0H12+MbARUf17sBwRb bJ2fSXVYaGw0jc8PADxhnYkOnKaouCkMY9bMk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=o5PXSC2U4phV3OBTfSOUjoYz+gl7rVMB0COpuwofUzwBL9AwX/IoYiKolquLjaxHDY 0CBrnraQXsZp8WhBE1STF1gwaS1Ic5uSD4PVdqhM6uC6C0ta6QHnl7pMxMvAK7eYqEK9 hj9zAtZ06/Atc993eXMLXddU9jLblN4a9s24E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: 4wayned@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <20101005222639.03ff44c1@pws-pc> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:04:22 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e8LWOsUUKKPXQM-Q9Uxtx5un3r4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git repository From: Wayne Davison To: "Benjamin R. Haskell" Cc: Peter Stephenson , "Zsh Hackers' List" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a0710e5c8ed0491e5d793 --0016e65a0710e5c8ed0491e5d793 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > Is the git repo still "unofficial" with the CVS repo as the "one true Zsh"? > I'd be more inclined to call it unauthoritative, since the CVS is the master. I don't know how others feel about it, but think of it as a project-maintained mirror of the official source. ..wayne.. --0016e65a0710e5c8ed0491e5d793--