From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8848 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2011 01:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 28622 Received: (qmail 10562 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 01:50:52 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8eKfpAtcI1yAfQXEBtQcWevob/tQ0V3U1oIJTqCRzB4=; b=b/kiAyIlHf9fehWJ/DKrjb/pGukTQ3N5g8X+AK/YHdB7pQ7GOiRcsZxAyvYypZkyXr m8V2iqVRhsiyGGtP8fXOoIeMrTQdreKDm2anxNOolsj7E7Lrj5iPEFzqD3O0pTfg9l/1 7l5kMeRM+XLXFJ+EUwiMe0Xb1d1grsPCoggaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=usvX1iSEPt79NjJg/oebl7xZtbF8pK/AqnIXr/ubr/Jd+pUQUw5hf0509cYG0mb9YC etxyWfq+KWNHkZQ5OPNfmRbY6f37zwdADoWRUJO6cQV4B87Z9Z2PT2sM4VodKsB2nVHX RKNvf1o1bDCMhgrdNbrW+buvqfDeoo4Jkk/ow= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1294710389.18824.1414500371@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1294704977.26846.1414490063@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1294710389.18824.1414500371@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:50:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 4.3.11 TRAPEXIT() on cygwin From: Mikael Magnusson To: Anthony Heading Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 11 January 2011 02:46, Anthony Heading wrote: > Errm, yes I remember seeing that discussion, but it was basically about > pipelines, traps set within subshells, and implicit vs explicit exits. > > I don't believe this is the same thing. > > Anthony Please don't top post. >>From the referenced mail: > Other cases I missed before include anything along the lines of: > > echo $( trap 'echo exiting' EXIT) > > or similar substitutions. That's quite clearly a subshell entering to > the same extent a ( ... ) is. How is that different from what you wrote? Which would be quoted here for reference if you hadn't top posted. ;) -- Mikael Magnusson