From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28681-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 210 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2011 11:18:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28681
Received: (qmail 15971 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2011 11:18:50 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=E5NZ1sIZnqfmiwkr0eXlQyFOKc0hdKoP3xcJTZAoQpU=;
        b=bZPZr/Qmc4Jo2Q0yZQ38k7Ur3DxhAA6AAL4kHoWmMCyRqbiYtIyabzbniludnyrj2R
         wIaBJ+e8aNuJqZBJu5nKcDUwPVEKNzjAEM81oGux/gi43Crn93i4JYqf4lIk4UPuG/e3
         x8GogYBjTy8lJMsjSDpsvTg7XSOxl4e85K1sE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=dqO7BDC6enE2lqyzh5SdW/b6RJ8OGLNOIxLkLNrkP8kTOsygWx0IXOMFUyhJSFAhPJ
         ooMgXJ6pBDrb3W9uparcFBJP7v+rUE3Tx14nAqQ4d2Dd8hPzzsvcFObkDM+Od7xmzlT6
         pbnaaavLrk9D2/MhN6wmzoWwxBeoeNxn8c+uQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=PxzNVGxac5v64UZ4Sa_JwFXAdhxnxrpx_3gtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimtzJnpA=_QQgz4bSYZEjHydCSh6PLMKzFtwueS@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimYBY7nA_FCXTA8n-ukYwBxnobmoUNowJ6kxaGz@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTikAKmnTt+9o5ibUGevk+m=rZJg9WrxV1WP+hX6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTinYiKLp11GTOKaMb_8BTPKvjP+U6won9V4BFHxk@mail.gmail.com>
 <87oc74dpuy.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> <AANLkTimKPLUHcHj_aZciwNLDt_+noEW0G=PEdYSVEL9b@mail.gmail.com>
 <87d3njemu9.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> <110126090508.ZM2111@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <110126092944.ZM2205@torch.brasslantern.com> <AANLkTinQW1fYGBhX4u8NFniFYN6y6FPr-wgaDHbF8U1j@mail.gmail.com>
 <110129211610.ZM21714@torch.brasslantern.com> <AANLkTimKbEbEjzW07wwqmFzV67EZQx5ngdY0vhZjzks2@mail.gmail.com>
 <110129231514.ZM21967@torch.brasslantern.com> <AANLkTimEpSx5H5WUWN1RtmJYG1C0wqNKUFM=vTV5N_7U@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTi=PxzNVGxac5v64UZ4Sa_JwFXAdhxnxrpx_3gtw@mail.gmail.com>
From: cheer_xiao <xiaqqaix@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:18:24 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTin24Ced+p0+DCUhoGg_H6w=VBPRDBXdp9_mEHgp@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Slow completion when using aptitude
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

By any means, the inconsistency of apt-get's and aptitude's behavior
should be a bug; either we make them all look for all packages - an
approach not correct enough but doesn't lag; or speed up the procedure
aptitude looks for available packages and apply it to apt-get too.