From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28494-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 6070 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2010 21:17:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28494
Received: (qmail 10855 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 21:17:41 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=I7GIijJvtvFJQ8zMjHK7R++AXD1Owv5GyzGS/S7XKdQ=;
        b=TuuQeSwN6v7zZaigdOKZGdxIIYIB2//lceaE52pmIKBSVscD3DZHpPca9zJcJ7tDoF
         iRKS9KgaQHrgj+Myp16aY6pj9lcCe9/5g8YxgT+ifiPrAuZKSsQyC1ye5hkQnncJakPc
         7F93Pe6KfxNlQbofzuyA4rChyUvTcbNVUJ1I8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=t1n1D7c5eblvhY0ADjhQlp1dmBbEEv3hW5wNfU8HXQ/Xq3VNlxUVSRQdxlCqlCxg1m
         xfiALQUzI+YzhQJn0HftC8BSahYB54L+ckuVBucofGBoAMFUvFwhSYmSAGInHR/1D3C0
         pwgIcMsA13Cmokqtps6syMVHLEt0OYtf5QmC8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikvssL1T2hJRpNfuSOmbKbF3KS2VV9CViHeawzu@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimOhbjnSiCWJ9y8jJ_WCscTF27ROR=Fg2twOMod@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTinvYn_F50XiPdMauivmpsg2-NE9DrYzwcc+a+b8@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikvssL1T2hJRpNfuSOmbKbF3KS2VV9CViHeawzu@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:17:16 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinGZO_yfpv3QsOt3PiVWsWNMKwSKk0Crvz=Vt3E@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: extended braces syntax, {1..32..-03}
To: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
Cc: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 22:00, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> Originally i had the same number of zeroes regardless of the minus
> sign, but bash does it this way, so I figured I'd be consistent with
> that.

Oups. Can I claim "too stupid to read" in my defense?

While I can see the advantage in being compatible with Bash, this
behavior is arguably a bug. If you want, I can pester them about
changing their behavior. Or you decide to change it. Or I just shut up
:)


Richard