From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11834 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2016 12:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 39800 Received: (qmail 25378 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2016 12:11:32 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(133.208.98.3):SA:0(-2.7/5.0):. Processed in 0.330054 secs); 01 Nov 2016 12:11:32 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at spf01.biglobe.ne.jp designates 133.208.98.3 as permitted sender) X-Biglobe-Sender: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH} define _GNU_SOURCE on Cygwin From: "Jun T." In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 21:11:22 +0900 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <9E7FD5B2-061D-4ABE-84A8-A54C844E34BE@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <20161026105652.GA14865@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <20161027013438.GB15799@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Biglobe-Spnum: 64220 On 2016/10/31, at 15:15, Peter A. Castro wrote: > I built with Cygwin 1.7.35 Thanks. > With the proposed patch from Jun, zsh compiles, links and runs the = check tests "adequately". Did you get any "new" warnings when building with the patch? (new =3D no warning without the patch) > I say "adequately" because there were 2 test failures, 5 skipped and = 40 successful. Do the same 2 tests fail if you do not apply the patch? > As a result, I only applied the change to zsh_system.h, which was = successful. Yes, that is sufficient to test the patch. Jun=