From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29090-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 27835 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2011 11:14:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29090
Received: (qmail 13002 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2011 11:14:49 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.210.43 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=u1nTdNvsW7SFcNusmK15uUACf5gxtj1BDBz+E1im3/E=;
        b=cuocB3xG3R56reFnIlWRuYL7korj2jM7uBJ0hssclSEk7ACNNxlS4SWzqxHnLVcfI9
         LYNQl5tIC5ctj/sw1FatJtp7R7o2DgHzoiR4LaT56ZQ18q+gUxYbyj9donvrLd8B82s/
         XwTgPpztLyB0yTtqWl+KkzgVSXcpimeRZaXpw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=mWaSNfv60WZ4mCAWKXW4AzNA5HvJ+DgJpFJeQzmdNFwqhOTk1SGKXQo/5ono4R1BfA
         TRxhws7QZM3GqaTBRTGkhPo+/T8d9jwi3Cnvhz0D2Sx/oH8aZDqn6RdwV9CiRR4FmnrP
         pADFfRhuxBjZ3CIGiOKxwnb2a6YF4SILmQez0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nikolai.weibull@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=AmaOsNGOeGSAbkoYVWHLh4Ujk2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinKo=W8umz=JfneD3MNYdmv=xYhFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87liyw7t0o.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org>
	<BANLkTim6WJWCrfLokA045Sc8su8DMXnKNw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=eLWad_TB4L=chD=3Fb_Pd9AQyqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=PrLsikjVhA-e06gjEkkxDpsdVaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=N0DjXbf70LCo422DQ_2b0_dK_AQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikwk=OUQ7TzQB6FNcD2wztj+LHOGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinadx+av3XhHrdem8aNqp=k7Gm69Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikLMKZmCAxt=Ac-t-R_ZccZMt3pqg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=AgTZNVCjqUB7LSbnQyMLPUfkT5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTik0cYpzkbOZxf+R=dyjhH_7-i++0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=iJXX_gBxnGFmDmF4goLeK0OKL3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikODTsXkB82KhVhWBaAs9GcYnqBgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=DjdOa-wS7070AVZfTD+aU_O0Uug@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=AmaOsNGOeGSAbkoYVWHLh4Ujk2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:14:43 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y1zyEL32eEa0jJky2PPB0kxhzBA
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=rHrGpJOhwe2f6Quc-zSHbERV-KA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Slowness issue with git completion
From: Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>, Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org>, zsh-workers@zsh.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:42, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:30, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
>>>> Felie Contreras wrote:
>>>>> Are you interested in fixing this use-case even if it means to make
>>>>> some compromises in correctness or not?
>>>>
>>>> No, I=E2=80=99m not.
>>>
>>> I am not used to zsh development, so is Nikolai's opinion shared by
>>> the rest?
>>
>> I am primarily not interested in fixing it when you pose it to me in
>> the manner that you do. =C2=A0You may not be aware of it, but your way o=
f
>> expressing yourself is rather inflammatory.
>>
>> There=E2=80=99s a big difference between writing

> I do realize it, I don't care.

So my judgment of your attitude was correct.

> [=E2=80=A6]

I guess it=E2=80=99s time to end this meaningless line of discussion.