From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29359-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 3218 invoked by alias); 23 May 2011 16:34:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29359
Received: (qmail 17229 invoked from network); 23 May 2011 16:34:09 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=MCP30i+ip8mr+zJLanT1KSxvFMev3c+YtDKKZ7O6/Ps=;
        b=rAh0xj0fqvqvA6meZPVUfFFTEWoKY2JU80GJRgzBRcQhWMygOZbSuu+ZfwQhqXhGXC
         U/K/cnjN1iQgDTIpAKfe7fdaJfV2+J/lXmn3dK03TjHtpWdObREc4zw9w6sNTBddf+id
         0CpypS4AkN8jv86pAeWi0G3rYvOr4RBg4kXlE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=WWkNyqNjYvOoutAVPUHdKFBuTTw8qsdBkKoj3kUJQdmm3/CiwfMqfi1NLK1h/TiGp8
         sVf400HdFF+uN3hWgmGC9+/hRwVCK6IXV0rEQ1miRn1L8Nvdp0zw02fKlk7FrORtiehv
         xi6HQSbes11AZHvowr1VyYZs8qKTidHG1nDgo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110523172709.42f96f85@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
References: <20110523161035.747f484d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<BANLkTikMf5QA30RxWhL=WpMwbFznfPERsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinUaE7S0UF67empL53Vqbs=dqA1tw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110523165614.5e638a17@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<110523091052.ZM10054@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<BANLkTimYGyg5Cf2v3yyvM_1iorRa53e6eQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110523172709.42f96f85@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:34:03 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTikmpbyJ6bZ_SqrrAVAa+S+w12qkHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Test failure with negative substring offsets
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com>
Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 23 May 2011 18:27, Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 18:19:04 +0200
> Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> But maybe the autoconf macro
>> could define a ZSH_PRINTF_SPECIFIER to %ld or %lld depending on what
>> zlong is?
>
> That would be useful, unfortunately those aren't the only cases...
>
>     if test "$zsh_cv_64_bit_type" = no; then
>       zsh_64_BIT_TYPE(quad_t, zsh_cv_64_bit_type)
>     fi
>     if test "$zsh_cv_64_bit_type" = no; then
>       zsh_64_BIT_TYPE(__int64_t, zsh_cv_64_bit_type)
>     fi
>
> I'd settle for just casting to long here.

Where do you mean? %d and (long)foo shouldn't work, it would need to
be %ld. Or you mean in those two cases? Then we would need a
ZSH_POSSIBLY_CAST_WEIRD_TYPE_TO_LONG define too :).

-- 
Mikael Magnusson