From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29296-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 7857 invoked by alias); 15 May 2011 10:02:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29296
Received: (qmail 24040 invoked from network); 15 May 2011 10:01:59 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.212.43 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=7SrejTlVBp+BduQOXOSBA0H9r5oHq3RzhoR0bh0e0lU=;
        b=kx/YkxHCG6lkoueIssJ9asgCutapuoSaDGQ/rJ35vP/r9fPvqsm8YnkgzpQBfwS1w+
         87pKvFcE7mx3pJDP6eGKtyHmQkEZ3aSzBrpgsF9NzyT7l+q5GHbN/0Ed8A9CfRYk/KyF
         z3YjMTtNP22+SxHbNAeu0gr7zHC36ekbnt7uQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=OjcyxUHBSYIv4exPeo2fQEpgGFAzEdkjt7IuF+CEMCn2cY8FdiwpjC7NDFOKzbSZDV
         v4Bnj6Ez/yEx5R5ML01j8W364RJ5n2lNnNH22WLlGsLwY/9rVhE3GFn9XsSHcufnEBu+
         QxV4QhdYXh4Zi1FDyDiO+DEuwwo7g/7wMNcPo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimts9FbKv9Et4kNfS544zfXCd-Gdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikqnR3pJk8FzRT6Qo9J+wTMGSnycQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110513191710.657d2f61@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
	<BANLkTi=KyDfiM1YqXR0q1w-PxiAeQ0thdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110513195324.6ab90eb2@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
	<BANLkTi=7vnGkz2uPTyd3Br019SuxV5_Q2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<110513225805.ZM13712@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<BANLkTi=c-dxpE5Dtm-SAEFE8YJRaguc+Tw@mail.gmail.com>
	<110514183909.ZM15134@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<BANLkTimts9FbKv9Et4kNfS544zfXCd-Gdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 12:01:54 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTikq=otx2bc0G0N+YTDRJecYxA94sA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH Re: squeeze-slashes false not working?
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 15 May 2011 11:48, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is the squeeze-slashes setting
> needed at all though? It seems like changing it or path-completion has
> exactly the same effect; does enabling squeeze-slashes change some
> behaviour that disabling path-completion does not change?

Ignore this, I'm not completely awake yet :)

-- 
Mikael Magnusson