From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15030 invoked by alias); 23 May 2011 16:01:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 29353 Received: (qmail 26899 invoked from network); 23 May 2011 16:01:00 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2miL6WwXttYsn3kVQx/Hl+XUt3+6kBY4M7lBoFEj6o0=; b=J9CL2u2pr0IlIMn4o2t+yk9jgmCpAU+upOaXU6eAKOI19sFXBl5SEcRidzhEY64T8P 6BCdu0LtWseNNuIoGyw8+KPWvifjFZNVR4k251rc3bh80syRaUKaMxbrh/6eEY7cXXFW IWzdvAm8fa5mOs/CjuVRC/8pVpJpCOPnFxqvw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ghcO21+Xrxa0RcIUzR8HYVLCp1uHqGmZe/gmoUdeRfxNeZ5/hk/yFdUCfsRWBcstcu 0pVpqK65bClVcOAVTNqAufpgtHgbrLeXREMiTHWyqOhEpQV5lFICJFQ7ddTc/N4CyguV Guoz93DXKpOSQ7SWzEnJliyCB6Nkg0g+sIcFg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <110523085815.ZM9832@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <1306165923-21449-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com> <110523085815.ZM9832@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:00:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Test failure with negative substring offsets From: Mikael Magnusson To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 23 May 2011 17:58, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On May 23, 5:52pm, Mikael Magnusson wrote: > } > } Does this make it work? (and if so, why? :) > > No. Okay, good, it was a long shot. I saw in my original diff that I had removed an if (length < (zlong)0) and left the cast out in my new code. -- Mikael Magnusson