From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29154-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 26683 invoked by alias); 5 May 2011 16:40:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29154
Received: (qmail 8044 invoked from network); 5 May 2011 16:40:26 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.214.43 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=r3LRgRDLpa+sewx3dp0vxD1HAsGN0hCwG493ueDwcy0=;
        b=oiRU/wFmbmVEJRm7re1eRGA3m+reIuC9Ly+QADA2PsRpMDHH7nIeYANZ+dKI3QNcmo
         xPgvK12xL9NN5UnBV3KnL1dYu8oMkoRC5qzHigs9z28s/efQP+Mi0Rn6SzPAEifQxCcR
         JxMUQnyRwY6OBt2rvJYF/8XeKJddrR4dOp1Ts=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=CS4FqfHSKlUrtbJgivwT7fXKkAJj7svQITp7OElUoBfkKW+QfDt2+orOn8dIgWQC4B
         NJTL18QU/GG10Gcfxt8Y7isv1vOwKz+nA53Kixeq6atidYHkOuN42EhPyGx4K3EBIyUE
         lG7yaMcXu3s3DPIp81CqbJxZmwoHO0gZhSQt8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <110505092438.ZM19431@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <BANLkTik3BGrNd389-cDELWwdqR_LZ-qgOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinGAGOPj52wRq1yjpyJtmSuZhMCmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<110428203139.ZM11856@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<BANLkTin1YcDOSGb+9FGYVgoC4cwN37_dnA@mail.gmail.com>
	<110502184235.ZM14465@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<BANLkTiktPbzZ4v=NSNkP5CV78ctSTQ9gsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<110503073902.ZM15889@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<110503080432.ZM15979@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<BANLkTim9YUZh8YMfvFxWqJnHHC6UtMaLag@mail.gmail.com>
	<110503173950.ZM16589@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<BANLkTikV0cywaRMjjoync444ANgmorqg7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<110505092438.ZM19431@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:40:19 +0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTimce1EX6LKGNrz1AUXktO=6VaqJkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: zle messes up 'words' variable?
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> w=
rote:
> On May 5, =C2=A05:39pm, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> }
> } The problem with the the zsh completion is that it's so slows that is
> } basically unusable. And apparently you guys want it this way [1].
>
> The problem with hopping in to a list where you aren't a subscriber
> is that you miss nuance and follow-ups.

True. But I asked the question very clearly[1], and nobody seems to be
interested in fixing the slowness issue *now*, and trying to improve
the performance of the more correct approach *later*. I read a few
more mails in the thread online where I wasn't CC'ed and to me it
still that nobody is pushing for a compromise.

If there's will for a compromise, then I can help, even for the
correct approach, but if not, I don't see the point of subscribing;
git's bash completion works perfectly fine for me *now*.

Cheers.

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.zsh.devel/22480

--=20
Felipe Contreras