From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29323-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 11000 invoked by alias); 19 May 2011 15:17:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29323
Received: (qmail 15985 invoked from network); 19 May 2011 15:17:19 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at brasslantern.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimMFRvw6a6wxPxA656KJ+_oommMLA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110519140215.2879aeeb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<BANLkTimMFRvw6a6wxPxA656KJ+_oommMLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 08:17:13 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinen5KwzxSoPtVd9=TG9AATvZFYkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next zsh release
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com>, "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
> PATCH: Remove some unused assignments/checks noticed by clang

I'm really leery of this one.  There were at least two cases someone
spotted where the changes were wrong, weren't there?  Seems like a bad
thing to gamble on right before a release.