From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 574 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 07:36:49 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 07:36:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 22152 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2003 07:36:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18171 Received: (qmail 22145 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 07:36:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 07:36:37 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [62.253.162.42] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 7:36:36 -0000 Received: from home.ducasi.org ([80.5.105.182]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20030131073639.LRUW14589.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@home.ducasi.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:36:39 +0000 Received: from dis.strath.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.ducasi.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B004311FB38; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:36:38 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:36:38 +0000 Subject: Re: {SPAM?} Important! Please don't delete. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk To: Mads Martin Joergensen From: Duncan Sinclair In-Reply-To: <20030131013551.GA29518@suse.de> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Hi, On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 01:35 am, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote: > * Duncan Sinclair [Jan 30. 2003 22:51]: >> Hi, >> >> Did someone say the spam problem had been fixed??? > > Yes. A spam problem being fixed does not necessarily mean that 100% of > the spam is gone. These lists have no spam problem anymore. If you're > that sensitive you would probably have to start learning how to > spamfilter yourself. I do have a spam filter - SpamAssassin put the "{SPAM?}" into the subject of the original message for me. SpamAssassin scored the message at 23.5, almost 5 times the score of 5 it needs to flag the message as spam. X-Spamcheck: SpamAssassin (score=23.5, required 5, AS_SEEN_ON, BULK_EMAIL, CASHCASHCASH, COPY_ACCURATELY, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, FINANCIAL, FREE_MONEY, INITIAL_INVEST, JODY, LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2, LINES_OF_YELLING_3, MLM, NOT_INTENDED, NO_REAL_NAME, ONLY_COST, OPT_IN, PARA_A_2_C_OF_1618, READ_TO_END, RISK_FREE, SECTION_301, SENT_IN_COMPLIANCE, SPAM_PHRASE_21_34, SUPERLONG_LINE, USER_AGENT_OE) So I couldn't help wondering why sunsite.dk's spam filter thought the message was OK... Sorry for the noise... Cheers, Duncan.