Will this change actually harm anything - foreign libraries, etc?

If not, then because it clearly benefits some people, the cost-benefit calculus favors change.

I don't like it, but my opinion doesn't matter because the change harms nothing.

On 28 September 2022 06:17:59 UTC, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:39 PM Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/27/22, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>> > -1 on the patch because I don't believe people who disagree with the
>> > change feel comfortable saying so publicly.
>>
>> If a word is so bad that people don't want to say that they want to
>> keep it, then we should not keep it.
>
>There's nothing "bad" about the word a priori. If *you* believe it has
>to be changed, then *you* have the burden of proof.
>
>Just like any other change.
>
>-- 
>Felipe Contreras
>

-- 
Ellenor Bjornsdottir (she)
sysadmin umbrellix.net