From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2490 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2014 17:05:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33613 Received: (qmail 29314 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2014 17:05:13 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=wxcfflKZi06kfMHA6Fr8y9+kN/m6NrB8bJYA68kXzl8=; b=go2BXZwb2vSoI+TjkNgbN5HrK0Hz+DRraKC3jSWEHJXUrmVBYRrfyE1OLsjQVG8END 6kkYCKK3htpJgpmbjDSbfcoRqytRcxKiU2aPpZQrbbi4DjGkGiHhQyEAfKrxshJkEopl cEnlEjFblcuIKZsyhOh9HJSM7Bsd8lXiin7FXcj1fN+R9zhQ2TWIh0Lfn51DppWAn6uj dLlpJ3o77Y1K6AD65a9DCl2T3jHuVnG5xWZYkwwek2LOSaFb4xavZI8PSBxQYhf2vxqo SMqeybSV/u6vo7VqINf61pA2fnU1QkU0b23gMzTkyJGTIqnH1d9k2TB4ivHoP7aLHaCQ nprw== X-Received: by 10.180.212.110 with SMTP id nj14mr43030078wic.45.1415293114909; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 08:58:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <141106075609.ZM3709@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <141106075609.ZM3709@torch.brasslantern.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbWllIFJvcXVldA==?= Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:58:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Zsh bugfixes released by RedHat To: Bart Schaefer Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a11c341605e1e670507339bcb --001a11c341605e1e670507339bcb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014-11-06 16:56 GMT+01:00 Bart Schaefer : > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1806.html > > Anybody know if these are new patches invented by RedHat, > or something they selectively picked up from our git? > > I don't immediately recognize the descriptions in the errata. The syntax fix is a combination of commit 8879c46a4897a0e347455334fc6b6732c203a220 and commit 9a044f1a6ad4ecfdfeff2f89e1685a1d622cb029, both in git. The malloc workaround is attached and *not* in git. Its name suggests it's only a workaround, maybe the reason no patch was sent upstream? Best regards, --=20 J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie --001a11c341605e1e670507339bcb Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name="BZ-978613-malloc-from-signal-handler-workaround.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="BZ-978613-malloc-from-signal-handler-workaround.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_i26cu7l80 LS0tIHpzaC00LjMuMTAvU3JjL2V4ZWMuYy5vcGVuICAyMDA5LTAzLTE2IDIzOjU3OjA3LjAwMDAw MDAwMCArMDUzMAorKysgenNoLTQuMy4xMC9TcmMvZXhlYy5jICAgICAgIDIwMTQtMDQtMDkgMTk6 NDE6MjUuODI5NDUzOTU1ICswNTMwCkBAIC00MDgwLDcgKzQwODAsOSBAQCBleGVjc2hmdW5jKFNo ZnVuYyBzaGYsIExpbmtMaXN0IGFyZ3MpCiAgICAgICAgc2Zjb250ZXh0ID0gU0ZDX0RJUkVDVDsK ICAgICBkb3NoZnVuYyhzaGYsIGFyZ3MsIDApOwogICAgIHNmY29udGV4dCA9IG9zZmM7CisgICAg cXVldWVfc2lnbmFscygpOwogICAgIGZyZWUoY21kc3RhY2spOworICAgIHVucXVldWVfc2lnbmFs cygpOyAKICAgICBjbWRzdGFjayA9IG9jczsKICAgICBjbWRzcCA9IG9jc3A7Cgo= --001a11c341605e1e670507339bcb--