On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:56 PM Jun T <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote:

>
> # TODO: Should this be static?  Calling `system_profiler -listDataTypes`
> takes
> # about 0.07-0.08 secs on my machine.  Does this list ever change (between
> # different versions of OS X)?
> _data_types=( SP{AirPort,Applications,Audio,...(snip)...,WWAN}DataType )
> # the dynamic alternative is:
> #_data_types=( ${${(f)"$(_call_program path system_profiler -listDataTypes
> 2>/dev/null)"}[2,-1]} )
>
> At least on macOS Ventura (the latest), "system_profiler -listDataTypes"
> gives somewhat different list of data types. And I think the time
> required by this command is negligible (I can't notice any delay).
> So isn't it better to use the 'dynamic alternative' in the above comment?
>

I think the dynamic alternative is better if possible.

-- 
Shohei YOSHIDA(syohex@gmail.com)
<http://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry/https://mail.google.com/_/scs/mail-static/_/js/k=gmail.main.ja.tLQrNXCHmdo.O/m=m_i,t,it/am=nBHH5b_7g8gZ7tIn1f7977tLmp39J3_3JgBC2Amo_5v9P4jWA_ug_FA/rt=h/d=1/t=zcms/rs=AItRSTNJwrjV1i8LKqdsHFfbx47Tnlb-Bw>