From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4685 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2015 22:20:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 37113 Received: (qmail 10459 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2015 22:20:39 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DCKm3xzbNSoybnkezQVAqtTOVLJdJCM4wepqUwvb/vs=; b=IH1WVT6ZZTBk2ovkD0bYn8/3nwWxKGt95qRbNlSRwqHZIidlUwysJI2y3F1gWGVx05 W6WT5YGRuPVERtzyoylYHH3CU0mEqbXc07oo6dWahF0t/mm7tiFvdeGYuy5e/SQ3nskA B3fVpm5WtDKzkZb1JnsmI8qu5lLOqFgUa+EDcDE3cbGsCrWyAC5fKHiXVPPRUPbAnKP1 gPA34G6CuctVJqSGNqyXZiFSI++o14wBLGLuWiWyJ3TvUWcsoZ/v+RwSOjDEShsJ2QHQ wopfKGOVlV6PwWO6sHTONKLwfOE52/AvKVLCgISjhFUnaZC9vOK0aAG72bdAkDSs8kox XPzg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.209.195 with SMTP id mo3mr28373018wjc.16.1447539636431; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:20:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <151114134013.ZM1779@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <151113170324.ZM32765@torch.brasslantern.com> <151114110330.ZM1697@torch.brasslantern.com> <151114134013.ZM1779@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:20:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bug in alias expansion From: Kynn Jones To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Nov 14, 2:19pm, Kynn Jones wrote: > } > } I still find it disconcerting that file globbing would get in the way > } under v. 5.0.7 but not under v. 5.1. > > Between 5.0.7 and 5.1 we introduced a keyword for "typeset" so that the > parser could distinguish assignments-in-argument-position from simple > arguments. In 5.0.7 and earlier "typeset" is merely a command, so its > arguments are treated like any other shell word. Thanks again. That's very helpful.