From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35911-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 12413 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2015 21:34:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35911
Received: (qmail 18900 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2015 21:34:08 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=oyd4wcoce6mdfSId8TNOSnowSa4cRcIQmNeJ8D8RCjA=;
        b=DsbUIB+YN2J1cNZpQIAR7iVzWjp6kcSBWaRY3u/SzNIP3fIJJML6NKr3BzAr+pJ4bB
         +CifN0TdmXUo+H44m8ErkY04AfMdh2fZ7UemFGwfXXo8BQgQcresq9BYLSvzprQ5E+AA
         q52GqIkYTZoIGZwy6g2wd5zLrAOHIZ0EkbS4mspXtHcwvgNK0visSIXdDY/G7pmceRP3
         hkMcs6Or29gTgV1zeCOdnRna/TNsFoqlgMr0v0uPV2Tikz8toPvCtmimmz3jzw+68nF2
         9w+THNk/tZlLLWPC8MTl6c+GTLSVBEEW024koB4WIokMAMFPHfS4jzJ3fdpO0CriOI4W
         JBag==
X-Received: by 10.182.236.200 with SMTP id uw8mr20889640obc.19.1437860045461;
 Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: anntzer.lee@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <F7383D07-4E00-4FC2-8C0B-0A7A728D12D5@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
References: <CAGRr6BETX9g1RbBm9Ud0hgHp0C90gHsmW5CL+A0NDx2e_rmL4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <F7383D07-4E00-4FC2-8C0B-0A7A728D12D5@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
From: Antony Lee <antony.lee@berkeley.edu>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:33:46 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 482qdi8FxIf2kZZOMb8RPTmci10
Message-ID: <CAGRr6BGA+-UHXugybL5DvEmYHb+Zd_KYnhgQfoy1zaE+U-cvMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Improvement to python module list generation used for command completion
To: "Jun T." <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c362163f1f26051bb9e106

--001a11c362163f1f26051bb9e106
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Actually on Python2 "(name)" is not interpreted as a single element tuple
but as a parenthesized string, which is the same as the string itself, so
it works the same.
Antony

2015-07-25 11:18 GMT-07:00 Jun T. <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>:

>
> 2015/07/25 12:37, Antony Lee <antony.lee@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > so replacing
> >
> >   local script='import sys, pydoc
> > def f(p,m,d):
> >   if m.find(".") < 0: sys.stdout.write(m+"\n")
> > pydoc.ModuleScanner().run(f)'
> >
> > by
> >
> >   local script='import pkgutil
> > for importer, name, ispkg in pkgutil.iter_modules(): print(name)'
> >
> > in _python_modules yields a big improvement in speed.
>
> Thanks. It is indeed *much* faster.
>
> Do you think using 'print(name)' is sufficiently portable?
> It seems it works with Python 2.x, because it is interpreted
> as a print statement with a single-element tuple '(name)'.
>

--001a11c362163f1f26051bb9e106--