>
> Ok, this makes much more sense to me than the previous patch.  Thanks
> for digging in.


To me too :-) It's definitely cleaner and easier to follow.

Philippe


On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 6:44 PM Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:01 PM Philippe Altherr
> <philippe.altherr@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's true that in the first iteration of the while loop, the noerrexit =
> oldnoerrexit is always a nop. However, that isn't the case for subsequent
> iterations and in particular for the last iteration where it's important to
> always restore noerrexit to its original value (i.e., oldnoerrexit) even if
> that value isn't equal to 0.
> >
> > Now that I see this code under this angle, I think that a better version
> is one where noerrexit = oldnoerrexit is placed after the switch statement.
>
> Ok, this makes much more sense to me than the previous patch.  Thanks
> for digging in.
>
>