From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8157 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2013 00:11:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31938 Received: (qmail 22704 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2013 00:11:37 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IuffwH48scVCZ3gxvu4D+rZTD+er7O3PR6eNAqFz08A=; b=f5kExoLuP/SjNZMhMFxxzBmx3GdZiMukrUa6L+hCo2oWrcHJYuG2TVr62Sjzlq1hzm bLrQIltw6ur+f0OK3qRLUKg8yZk43Mox4CZ321BOH6TJEgw83jYt5dIvtxC482peXOSV 7kgPSDz3YmJa4Z/gOfdL2KtmyDLzjJIy5cu0ph/POte1FyT57JIzRhi/fbqlBqIa5BPL sJkOM9efRTOL5WXZI9miRpf+OJK2lEGpRifAIggmottzrLOfVetZOT/cTN9fyLTnyuy2 tBWb77DXs2zsHjHq9Tp68HDgZk0n6PbXpyybiLGWYyqWo+fMxjt3BIYLJeQj0hzJElQb U59Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluAwTk9lVU1u+SUcsRM2Y5pAb5aNg1Y2ktYfdLwoAGOg8rzYax8jqiHikl+LXVZVfIAuxs MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.73.97 with SMTP id k1mr483400lbv.58.1383783094151; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:11:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131106213344.3e9bea64@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> References: <131030092555.ZM8077@torch.brasslantern.com> <131105075700.ZM18043@torch.brasslantern.com> <20131105161858.543037da@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <131105114640.ZM18224@torch.brasslantern.com> <131105124000.ZM18277@torch.brasslantern.com> <20131106200715.6e549a6e@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <20131106213344.3e9bea64@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:11:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fish-like autosuggestions From: Bart Schaefer To: "Zsh Hackers' List" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Peter Stephenson wrote: > I've fixed a bug here --- zlecallhook() prepended the thingy name to the > argument list, but execzlefunc() prepended the function name, too. > I don't think both can be right --- that gives $0 as the function name, > $1 as the thingy name, and normal arguments starting at $2. I've always considered it a bug that we used the name "Thingy" in the first place. Nevertheless, I agree with this change. It's pretty unusual for widgets to examine their argument list anyway.