* [PATCH] using sysread/syswrite with coprocess
@ 2024-05-09 13:09 Anthony Heading
2024-05-09 22:38 ` Bart Schaefer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Heading @ 2024-05-09 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
Does the patch below make sense? I couldn't see a way to do this otherwise, as it doesn't look like the coprocess fds are exposed by any parameter to enable them to be passed explicitly. I see that using 'p' as a magic integer is supported by 'print' but undocumented, so maybe this style isn't preferred.
diff --git Src/Modules/system.c Src/Modules/system.c
index 929a8b002..e272ff391 100644
--- Src/Modules/system.c
+++ Src/Modules/system.c
@@ -78,14 +78,24 @@ bin_sysread(char *nam, char **args, Options ops, UNUSED(int func))
/* -i: input file descriptor if not stdin */
if (OPT_ISSET(ops, 'i')) {
- infd = getposint(OPT_ARG(ops, 'i'), nam);
+ char *infdarg = OPT_ARG(ops, 'i');
+ if (!strcmp(infdarg, "p")) {
+ infd = coprocin;
+ } else {
+ infd = getposint(infdarg, nam);
+ }
if (infd < 0)
return 1;
}
/* -o: output file descriptor, else store in REPLY */
if (OPT_ISSET(ops, 'o')) {
- outfd = getposint(OPT_ARG(ops, 'o'), nam);
+ char *outfdarg = OPT_ARG(ops, 'o');
+ if (!strcmp(outfdarg, "p")) {
+ outfd = coprocout;
+ } else {
+ outfd = getposint(outfdarg, nam);
+ }
if (outfd < 0)
return 1;
}
@@ -244,7 +254,12 @@ bin_syswrite(char *nam, char **args, Options ops, UNUSED(int func))
/* -o: output file descriptor if not stdout */
if (OPT_ISSET(ops, 'o')) {
- outfd = getposint(OPT_ARG(ops, 'o'), nam);
+ char *outfdarg = OPT_ARG(ops, 'o');
+ if (!strcmp(outfdarg, "p")) {
+ outfd = coprocout;
+ } else {
+ outfd = getposint(outfdarg, nam);
+ }
if (outfd < 0)
return 1;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] using sysread/syswrite with coprocess
2024-05-09 13:09 [PATCH] using sysread/syswrite with coprocess Anthony Heading
@ 2024-05-09 22:38 ` Bart Schaefer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2024-05-09 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Heading; +Cc: zsh-workers
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 6:09 AM Anthony Heading <ajrh@ajrh.net> wrote:
>
> Does the patch below make sense? I couldn't see a way to do this otherwise
There's nothing technically wrong with the patch, but you can do
coproc ...
exec {coprocin}>&p
exec {coprocout}<&p
and then
syswrite -o $coprocin ...
or
sysread -i $coprocout ...
Whether it makes sense to support direct access to the coproc FD by
either "-o p" / "-i p" or simply -p as with print / read, or neither,
I will leave for larger discussion.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-09 22:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-09 13:09 [PATCH] using sysread/syswrite with coprocess Anthony Heading
2024-05-09 22:38 ` Bart Schaefer
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).