From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: zsh-workers-return-43745-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8c2c4431
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:25:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 21823 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2018 15:24:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 43745
Received: (qmail 14619 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Oct 2018 15:24:47 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.208.182):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. 
 Processed in 2.580978 secs); 29 Oct 2018 15:24:47 -0000
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=CXcR6uo7078s9365uxdx5p5rUS/dQOqNS41o7CqJros=;
        b=P18rYVz5xkauTH0PSLnmUMhMyQc9cHvf1kbg6vzhg0qs3g0V5duZusYoCaWM/knWcl
         uQV2+mX0XJrEJ7bzG8uR00An0EUcEhbhtY/tKXZdF9/ckf0raf5ZbwKxQWkceZz+6eLM
         iHSofNFKDirS7LQz3JfH0u1MfQjyTxuxHG6EToSKYBZv78qUTM5do6dz7mgsr2/sZJwI
         1LpJbFInq9KnqNuMg2GWKfuDBX59G+ZkVGMHWBGIEQYuFY+tA5HxIOugDGgA0tKnR97a
         Q0srfhgXC83eMCahe/B/DPavwncbxeOXN4dX9TZBMg2UD8Cv0wVSI1IPHwuz2y/g4Hg6
         ZnVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=CXcR6uo7078s9365uxdx5p5rUS/dQOqNS41o7CqJros=;
        b=g0met7rQS178CrkwP6/eyau7rHz0e7IFKEMVFD0tuLMV1aATmRqk/PugibuPK1h+gW
         zIn47MPYufV/nbmx1i0RNg1/rNnSf6Awx7/b36gA76EiPpVJmv4xWPoMCMWEm8HErZty
         kSqXMlMA3uPNKK63EKNMOK12V0pNN1yO9Mgg5MbEDjJ6geeKg01V5+oH3Mw4/6HOXArr
         FdaQZ7rHuc4gdkA6QUXzlXxfoQuGNhk3q1N9qBLqHz3KdUDnVSp58MSVKZklV2jeNJZI
         VkCE3hJidhJ6Xcp7eaQ72/YA1isE4XWWQM8D7qRiipLxjFcRnqxKzi/9mTW/cUrJT3is
         0ONg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKxXbY50+s+WdLmlMSylAibjykIMk0F6aFAIv2yECtd6lz//gK8
	SmaSFJJj7GHryO4bRDU40SK4NhC4ZBUjViAtDekdiQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5clw7Ywusd5u2byrptjyJE/hPdZ5B58aUjuzYYckZX8T4kT16YXnMFVt7yKpeQCFTTuZ2thAYOcvXKwV/OcOHE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1b47:: with SMTP id b68-v6mr8262831ljb.104.1540826679524;
 Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKc7PVCdqYwOrYr5-7bzduNsJd9OAUz0B-68jg_D5MqMUiVnKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1BE52C46-161F-412B-A539-4B0EA87A2FCE@dana.is> <CAKc7PVAReJOH_T24hZ3qEMpyZGaXat3Ak7muYg9vJEC6HZKhag@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH+w=7ZH7tkqcSu6gPd6yOXosa2bGg2n6YtLU2x7rtU2gqsn6w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKc7PVCWY1hLgpcxj+v3-ZqiuzM435WsERE_QA130_1YSVMbXw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKc7PVCWY1hLgpcxj+v3-ZqiuzM435WsERE_QA130_1YSVMbXw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:24:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7YD_ovhQUJtcPjUY0gTgr2x_H+xpi0zaoW18pguvWDd7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in "-quoting and @-splitting, could someone elaborate?
To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>
Cc: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 2:11 AM Sebastian Gniazdowski
<sgniazdowski@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, with those clear pointers a new whole-picture can be constructed:
> - @ - keep array form
> - A - apply array form

Yes, much better.  The other effect of (@) is that, in double quotes,
the array elements become individually/separately quoted, similar to
the difference between "$*" and "$@".