On Jun 4, 2014 4:08 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>
> Bart Schaefer wrote on Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 23:42:29 -0700:
> > It might even be preferable if (Yn) implied (odoN).
>
> What would (odoN) do?  It produces the same output as (oN) alone, since
> presence of (oN) causes any other sort qualifiers to be ignored.

I verified by comparing the output of **/*(odoN) vs **/*(oN) that they may
in fact differ.  I didn't dig into exactly how or why.

More later when I have time to peruse the patches.