From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-41874-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 7202 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2017 08:04:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 41874
Received: (qmail 3346 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Oct 2017 08:04:12 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-qt0-f176.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.216.176):SA:0(-1.4/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.322915 secs); 13 Oct 2017 08:04:12 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS,
	T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=aBVf0PelSHGZr9jl4Lci2DsKmvsW92Fpd9WsKG+dcEg=;
        b=KGbDcmtzETKCFKf/SHitvKSRFKrQwhMt9ZeK6ObznDuOUqJEdg4mXsS+Qi1KVJarbr
         jlxAP5+b1HKh1Tk1KZAd1S1mFdmvHTmwCQNp/LK++t6uFhHRkfHcu3OPYQw797iXb3b3
         UCEUQAF89ZTUViLRyIoZ1HbR6sd2qMZaaC8ji9o4oTQMMd79T3t9rrqoXi905aXNjOGS
         CGg95DXtR2loBzLrhJD6S0pxOUTKjrCfQaUKw7i7JfhibOaRUxkYUYIOj4P++BTIRlif
         HpHJ5/3g3vrq2Ex04q++s/L2JwiY4uZXRbCzufIdM8Cb00oGeCrWcVyJeh7TIU+iSjB0
         KxGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=aBVf0PelSHGZr9jl4Lci2DsKmvsW92Fpd9WsKG+dcEg=;
        b=nv86ZoM2QTwBmB1dC+r7HTsIzcztBhWNaDlBXfnCKOC19Ta1S7nkt3CF5EBSsUM/p/
         9IJQL0HW5w+bkTn0i792MtR1eizopz3BgnpZKSocTv3Q01vWj/DtUjiCYre+mFGEBbCB
         als+2ezHNExEnuSdiPJaymve2eqXa1j8b4jW8tse8egCMBAg3iK1KZVWJGFbNC/O9q/N
         s5OBxKVoM0zovvO6Vejw/wWyDcLwGYkIdMo2Yeu8de/FMos1thSa4bzwLyq7QBWTqqhG
         BB2fJd1lnMGG+03oPoVBF2isVSFZF34BlDMc91c1P1esdduZ/QSB1RokZB/+IrwvkpB3
         F2Xw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVTNrVMV/V/grIXrULvZL3sSxZtheeOu6G0Q4VW5++tT9OcTTF5
	Akf2qhotqPOAj6LJ25Yf4Cxv830njqjMPdgK/OcGWg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SWK0Xl5iqSBfR3DwdyDnhbC7S7cOozeYVWH9HHwcmVKXKbOrDcs4olnIpcsGQk6Wds9etBkeJ+XjuUdclS0BY=
X-Received: by 10.237.33.186 with SMTP id l55mr829593qtc.71.1507881846690;
 Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <etPan.59e070ed.5eacd522.98a8@zdharma.org>
References: <etPan.59dce146.1b81bc1.98a8@zdharma.org> <etPan.59dcf31d.1706ff79.98a8@zdharma.org>
 <etPan.59dd94f1.69ba7f51.98a8@AirmailxGenerated.am> <etPan.59ddd6c5.c1b5c18.98a8@zdharma.org>
 <171011100231.ZM3821@torch.brasslantern.com> <etPan.59df8223.5720d9a5.98a8@zdharma.org>
 <CAH+w=7YkdCEZg79001PmZ-oWv18WgzfkD=o15h4Gwz3qhSiJ9g@mail.gmail.com> <etPan.59e070ed.5eacd522.98a8@zdharma.org>
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:04:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7YTF=P2pRb77dhSZ7dENNHo=buFLRwsWpB3Yg+-evRGGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] In reference to patch 39815, about (z) flag and $( parse error
To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Sebastian Gniazdowski
<psprint@zdharma.org> wrote:
>
> I was hoping that the goal of this patch wasn't exactly equal to what it did with (Z+cn+), i.e. that it accidentally changed the flag's behavior.

That *is* what happened, but that doesn't always mean that it
*directly* changed the behavior.