From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4567 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2021 05:09:09 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 13 Oct 2021 05:09:09 -0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; t=1634101749; b=WdgY/b4sbTN0qtVsbyS+x1fJKaqgpmBXXM2m2NdmdcEJLVObSUFbVDE0dYeSBBp/LIisF32oQS UEimXU6b6U6KuJwoLXMSJIpdDhdZXmKYhP+x3IHTV7pUck0qb0XDMGpZWqwx/TgAE1B/Z3LGhl sKQGHujCnHtpL/GDFXx7ANYbgwkM6AKy+dbJ3mHR/9PKa5hduxFdVFO0px2LnWMf4h8dg1xHdM 6rVCbsoLpf3/J0ch44Pv2IZm5XmThYzvalh1YZSLmfzUyj1WHqG2IGx0Zh30m8cZbozRm23e5g FqbA97E/6KXRGI4bYzn1UiAFujC/3dIMON9H8YWXoZjnyA==; ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; zsh.org; iprev=pass (mail-yb1-f174.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.219.174; dkim=pass header.d=brasslantern-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=brasslantern.com; arc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; t=1634101749; bh=VSdP+4MahyxKDm9fFVGZ1j/lfm8Z2K+Twje/FMzZh3E=; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature; b=BmOLc5PpIKXcKGQDLbNmq2JBj8x3v2J2NqndzcgrrcWLibLOTfSTe6j1XTLHhuF4hPgQb+A37x hdXexqwd+iyMA7yjM1NSwDisd5ss06+XSzBqnEUWMxRqyxavDAINd1tYFPlDTWhuw8SJPLQPjS Kw7iM6yCK7cMqzcK/z0yFdQadiucu5a7Kk4mf26yOooZcGBaNIpiQ9JCJs8aVBiKp8TiBhTJs0 oDQtiE8X2FC/qQWh4y69g32kFU+BDfLROLs3mwtegWPZw4rY39DLwWd2ApBI01wkVRsiiNBj1S kisvt6FMTw8WL3f5mknS+bQzY2lUBsDbqhiCy9CKm1Zy/A==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID :Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=Dqci7mdXGXvvMqNPCiEp8Ap1BvCT4YUMGCn9kXsH5Pg=; b=Z1sKPtrz8+GJCpAJpsejmFLQkI s13qOmVfMBJrdulYG6lVFlco83Rv0zqaWChdKNfNgWVj42pQ0WNx63a6sBgMUzbtUBzcohQXy7fiw RboQRjw8nLAH7rQVk6qUyY54DnUNxxB0hE9wkZaguKb/mZ+IvW4SYaC5mWMehvZPGoqS0UWLIMq3b VRu/+bhBkp2ih0E/+oWGBBXkmg8z6tOcKanWZz9HkLJPdK6bbFNO4iv+Gx90RxSnGME/jnOguvZVX 3Nx4qQ93ZuTwyLLEoXkzrD1Yx7HYJRKA9vdmS0LFUoaEJYPGeu1QT4M51Wi0owbwdBM3Z2LUD2jS7 hYv1JX0g==; Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with local id 1maWVp-00096y-91; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:09:09 +0000 Authentication-Results: zsh.org; iprev=pass (mail-yb1-f174.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.219.174; dkim=pass header.d=brasslantern-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=brasslantern.com; arc=none Received: from mail-yb1-f174.google.com ([209.85.219.174]:41970) by zero.zsh.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1maWVS-0008nl-QK; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:08:47 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-f174.google.com with SMTP id s4so3403980ybs.8 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:08:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dqci7mdXGXvvMqNPCiEp8Ap1BvCT4YUMGCn9kXsH5Pg=; b=yUkKA/jdEG4Hj+wF/2CCeuhHah/kPfHdGym7f9oCSUgK+oPLsy9GKYNedgUmamEmMr t/YHDQcVJB2nyVKjOOcEy61418r+uqYxGrRYzyvgo7/XyIK+57AG79eEA7JtAVG9L04A LnDDL1iKXoIXPrGW2QtLUgkBGiPoW1fbrGk71vlGetVIRj1Xm+zA+UrbKFW5MB9UU/f9 XWp71RHWo2ZbMow4QQvaZZfMOQMgtPaMagf+KidTh5avv95SNwX20fXL5aNQp0NrKEAj 4/N7CIocS091ginQKMwOINXhygBGtDtXQWvJNCO9wAU80QR8B3/YsDxyeL3yf7+kbJbE abYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dqci7mdXGXvvMqNPCiEp8Ap1BvCT4YUMGCn9kXsH5Pg=; b=VZccYa3FaNPghKXJy5cEY5ygG3vPl6275Vl/xAUDQWANHDIgu1ZA3EHZ+R9bDB9M+Q ywMFVlriNUGZupQNo7vOkWlOl0A915c1eJTXzRolfv0QjkF6B97iAjpNWGkJVbPFhy87 ssP9mTtK69vjh6fklh4Cfqe8kzaIjSh+FCv/hMRAlFPiIZC/qfx9aeprKcq9uerqvl9c jx8qYJlV2X3gOmikBL0EqafhNnhPv2bI1o27QoGUyITd+yMcA+eMQ/wyyPL+VmD7fpa1 eRan8cSOFrGozSee03AgGQheO8k2l/ClA6NSndy+wM1AODzGIyBJMLN8z/2B3cJmXfUw y+Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pU2yrATRBa3ntGKaB4Ws6f9OdNR5MKPrpO0iH/xzFoykZGUeC mkjXBT5A8ahPIUZF6SbjthtEtf6fHN/rSiLz7s1ZFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwc44MYmaZryNTGq/3uYfQjri3+aFU3NQC/tsIlI5TRZ3R6U+n6Jdd6Qty97IY299rryPgU7Ch63W3XMzjgHbg= X-Received: by 2002:a25:bd08:: with SMTP id f8mr32454799ybk.89.1634101725844; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:08:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211012152532.GC17948@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> In-Reply-To: <20211012152532.GC17948@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> From: Bart Schaefer Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:08:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] Add xfail tests for || form of completion matchers To: Daniel Shahaf Cc: Marlon Richert , Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Seq: 49479 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:26 AM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Marlon Richert wrote on Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 15:08:46 +0300: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 5:34 PM Marlon Richert wrote: > > > > > > The tests show how :||= matchers should behave in order to provide > > > completion features that cannot be implemented with :|= matchers. > > Would this be backwards compatible? In particular, with the exception of specific bug regression tests, all the tests using || matchers have been converted to xfails. Shouldn't there still be some generic tests of the (functionally correct subset of) the current behavior of || ? And, do you think any of the regression tests would begin to fail if the xfail tests begin to succeed?