From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d4210a18 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 21:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20269 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2019 21:10:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 45022 Received: (qmail 13375 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Dec 2019 21:10:58 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.102.1/25656. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(209.85.167.42):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.128447 secs); 13 Dec 2019 21:10:58 -0000 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.167.42 as permitted sender) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R6I/mnS7ZqQqUqDqPwZE2fp84D8xjaBMdoCxCNRfnRk=; b=J1yFjrUeqJHSKGJUo3JiqpI1mQACL7820j5D2wT2kpixT37mUyT5xIbGPqTtXvBefm oOTS781bw9AyRKdfTFJ+zrCUY5lY9P2XRfKirjkf6xSYEG8Hq38GjwQEZTSJLk1KGwLm vz0cS0ZkyvmUVQPKTWA9Mds2i9d/8As3r+f7q4K3L9qa0nC573wbsEeaOlku1hLfHYBK RbRF0Plq2qXeWt+eoT95nu0tqzWc6hWx2Iu/q4wVfgKKqd/kE8EzRwfS86ruZQvz7RwX bWUF7/QMEEdBwj8MK55vnJHJBIX+vrYiR8zUBsWFxqdiTXE5L7zvG3d4CwkFXpTNyms+ YbpA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW/8RWpHVIZi3Q80978lhKBnrY5egXYcaVE6ZalbypwWyN/HzQS YYrZR2QXDCfkX5mntlLA0iwqIdjrc2ahIaKuR8T0oLDZO00= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwm8I0vuZwl/itDaOmv/o7B/82g1lRYLTdulQjY3q0ZbTS7PiAdislX/3P5uta/TODM1GLmEjPO9I41UIb30zg= X-Received: by 2002:a19:ae18:: with SMTP id f24mr10463107lfc.155.1576271421258; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:10:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <569822988.994307929.1576256973462.JavaMail.root@zimbra62-e11.priv.proxad.net> <1576258224.5214.31.camel@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <1576258224.5214.31.camel@samsung.com> From: Bart Schaefer Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:10:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TR : Re : [BUG] Crash due to malloc call in signal handler To: Peter Stephenson Cc: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002251d305999c4a41" --0000000000002251d305999c4a41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 9:31 AM Peter Stephenson wrote: > > If you're using the current git source, exec.c line 4673 has a call to > fgetc(), which is indeed outside where signals are queued. ... The fix > might be > not to fdopen() the input file, but just read into a buffer with > read(). > Yeah, calling stdio routines with signals unblocked is not safe. We should be doing explicit memory management here. > --0000000000002251d305999c4a41--