From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: zsh-workers-return-43781-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 19f0901a
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 2335 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2018 23:46:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 43781
Received: (qmail 11752 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Nov 2018 23:46:28 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.208.178):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 0.746811 secs); 06 Nov 2018 23:46:28 -0000
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=2PsOu7D5J6OwKjlirldgVhChSxDS/5gTlf2MTmsOyj4=;
        b=bHu0zdRsVdFg2JdbeKXY9Pviw7EQgTQp/IyzBfmdswheVFYc9d2rPY9xlEmvdG/sBA
         XcaMxhtXtrCELksdR+RJS7S3+g6uSwayTG1G21Du5CdHHcN644JSFY0IUnvywLR6mF2N
         3vOjDduYgwxT6XgTtzT5rNEl4Wf7eoNxrQbhY053CkjXQl+20e8VbrlvSLLWt9K9Au4X
         Y/bLkkJuP1Qufl1S2dhzTjgkHdzKeVnB5SNNwRpltFWaBjhZczUrDllc3CQFVEGASAD4
         WZ3eCBKjcQWXLLFn1oZfECXB8DCSKc48mJ7nJ3TBfZXN0Z2oOtf2rdcbSOrQ2N7j0cYa
         bmnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=2PsOu7D5J6OwKjlirldgVhChSxDS/5gTlf2MTmsOyj4=;
        b=L6rJNGlxfeJ2rpkvnRJ5UrVQ5vg6Ugm/gCaNQ6GSlHZsTVrsHOk/mqFGq+NQIJgVSw
         zAPec3d44MoSNwaYKKaGISymZBIWpBAdOz4I8vZohN0IcsPvjv1FEXvi5q0x/r1FLMDC
         +Jdzb7lAW80JZPDFxFP1srE0PMJp5dp1kJgts72XG7xwdOo+b97qP5q0tbTJFXDCLwQP
         HttGmCXbg4SPeZ31unJNpuo7jTCX5bnZyHlSywpMuA0qX/o8M4ZfaMUJFNW+uFMlSgba
         6hWFfeih1DMj6BCleYZ9eMX1gwDgHRPvOikMyMf8b/Hkmp7WnOA3oui1Cqe3MHFGaajP
         ZKow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIMkH1oykymC6sD4vmUWkuN3vqfaFdP+gAmwLKikFULp5jfGyMk
	bROB9mr4gy8+7wkxebJIqqtt4QqAE373F+/zVmyJastS
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fz3jlevJrq7TTAC7Z0dvRmEukS5Prw6xfJkO1A5Er2bODXYRvKtl7wOt/2vFtBHThlfcFfBPRsifDG9ZSNG4Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:529d:: with SMTP id n29-v6mr17664359lje.54.1541547982933;
 Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:46:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKc7PVCEmTTMRR0P3kx9ktpLDBYqJ+MRsE77UMLFjonEZAixfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <58111-1540942908.680582@SXAw.BXd_.-x5N> <14759-1541295720.747208@yAOj.Gon2.-2mF>
 <CAKc7PVAWECysEz5Nwg8=BhGJ3rJ7d9Gdf1gUEja=AybFhzAdyg@mail.gmail.com> <1541543747.2475810.1568038456.0FCE8467@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1541543747.2475810.1568038456.0FCE8467@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:46:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7YmUo8ymY_vPoQru6xEZFT+mE-kZ4vVojw98o4j4c-pyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Should there be a Zsh release for true-color support to adopt earlier?
To: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
Cc: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:46 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>
> I don't have an opinion on whether to issue a 5.7.  That depends on what
> other changes have been made since 5.6, and I don't have time to review
> 'git log' currently to assess that.

Several more attachtty/subjob/superjob fixes that are probably worth
releasing (if people have actually been running the head checkout to
try them).