From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10989 invoked by alias); 8 May 2016 22:16:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 38435 Received: (qmail 9174 invoked from network); 8 May 2016 22:16:49 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=hhPxM29btpdsK5wNs4MDteu388Dk3LexnkDuKkuMQNk=; b=fdBTki5NLcIPy5zvDk5h0dM6xayY2oOC2wTuybjhKPrUIWwQkkTuAbvy15M2jXIZJZ DSW7idry9vunFwnct0y9zNRCFKyix6DAuabb8j+5gCOJMEohnm9STHtdXQjHxIQoFoF4 Nj+rtyAZ434+1R2FYH6jAf86AjaBIE7gLWk6QiCaQWgmzoAPqQlCt3qFAFSB07wkqnfC U2YI9XD/FA/iM1hHFGfz+fPnZGwhA2qQUmlKJvPT1t0f4mTILFbENi1caQrZ3s+sSzCM +3UF6uErPaFVGn3B6wu3tnSQaQYIVrO+sqah0gaD7TJ5PaVTXbujZ8SSyZqg+XleFJu8 TFHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=hhPxM29btpdsK5wNs4MDteu388Dk3LexnkDuKkuMQNk=; b=dUFyymUUwiiRqe+p18aEL5VkjCHlUrjMcreYeCS0NT1ZXxc9OpOSHwyFx1NPNCvMzB SGb8RKPRch8imVLVXG5S+zNvhnbpHQQ8Cbva0FPnjmM4KQNsZPYquY1avfz38whH5e+S RYx1s68THoFSDC3oB/Htk95HMUzap4lkY/yx0ZEcKr/bhTz5W02ZTId9P1sy1jKNv9Nj uXNzt6uukwDgwGuqilHnwDIXU82phY8cVBdumW7gcKYtCs5+gwwZViQbJwWKjk8LCMEN FbJ8RRztCH/JPudOKJguCMJYDMl0jXadnLBXRbYNWbJt+qka98nK223u8jXfaQUpn3d2 vJfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUe5t66Twg8i1gJxSLRMA36mmaNGTSbLDh6uexLeRRP13HfEg2d/kgmMA1oIBDyiDxzmcDUpBUTEoiVTw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.162.69 with SMTP id l66mr11566451lfe.43.1462745806260; Sun, 08 May 2016 15:16:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <160508145807.ZM10454@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <160508105949.ZM9904@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160508201217.5924511a@ntlworld.com> <160508132406.ZM10234@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160508212858.384e3dbf@ntlworld.com> <160508145807.ZM10454@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 15:16:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: leading '=' in enviroment variable truncated From: Bart Schaefer To: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > If we're going to go so far as to have a configure test, shouldn't we > include a check that setenv is in fact defined before attempting to > run a test that uses it? Never mind. You included the test but spelled "setenv" wrong, and I missed that you'd tested anything at all. However, even if I change the "setsnv" to "setenv" the test still gets the wrong results. conftest.c:259:4: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] main() ^~~~ conftest.c:261:7: warning: implicit declaration of function 'setenv' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] setenv("NAME", "=VALUE", 1); ^ conftest.c:262:29: warning: implicit declaration of function 'getenv' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] return strcmp((char *)getenv("NAME"), "=VALUE"); ^ conftest.c:262:21: warning: cast to 'char *' from smaller integer type 'int' [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] return strcmp((char *)getenv("NAME"), "=VALUE"); ^ 4 warnings generated. configure:12601: $? = 0 configure:12601: ./conftest ./configure: line 1719: 90473 Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) ./conftest$ac_exeext