From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7822 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2014 19:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33798 Received: (qmail 1865 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2014 19:01:13 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=j00Bg1QKFpWoW6qnwaMwqIhnc9EiNthXM4XOjQY0whY=; b=QA1LYLtVvm2J1IuxVdgli7rCFsxcWM7I/0I31K7q3pVKVaCwYPZENY9UW2KoDomAYM 8hJO73H884YQrxDINzTlYsM5iQ+C/KeyoP8BM/fsvEdHfJPEZ84Dg1FfFaUQt7+3F7Xc atoEfuHeVereLRL2aTHbhm0eJaBarToXWnbW6eT7klzFJMSHJrbYWcz1TE1ZhlPExTaG 1K27VcTnRuWa2G0ck9HjwWxXkM4NC/dvmTRIBHBAfC8C3lcg2zx63ViDx8XVufaSgbgL HGbyMOdQupCmJRGbBV5Lk4W5joSFEuetS7oXH7qVQnslxXQP4UPkosHS7mW5VqLk8otC SdIw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkuHBuRm1X7v1A2WuHCnswcf7Mp/kHG/QTaXAhHbFpJFgla6++N5RMnsK2gSkz5+iaghJVu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.75.199 with SMTP id e7mr34777162wiw.21.1416942069064; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:01:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <900E2DDB-B03E-4E1F-9F22-869D5A645E52@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> References: <141119085006.ZM18951@torch.brasslantern.com> <11014.1416438322@quattro> <141119222019.ZM2717@torch.brasslantern.com> <5A1A98B7-42E0-4EE1-9468-32E2D6434246@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <141120091803.ZM3693@torch.brasslantern.com> <900E2DDB-B03E-4E1F-9F22-869D5A645E52@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:01:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Confirming X02zlevi test failures From: Bart Schaefer To: "Jun T." Cc: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jun T. wrote: > Sorry for disturbing. No need to apologize. > So all the 10 characters (ESC ~ a I ESC ~ o ESC ~ ^X) are already > available when reading the 1st ESC. That implies that a simple write() on the master side of the pty device is not sufficient to cause the input to be received on the slave side. I don't presently have any ideas what to do with that knowledge ...