From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-32346-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 19618 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2014 22:20:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 32346
Received: (qmail 19541 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2014 22:20:24 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=R9eZYQu302N287Bkur3kVyVpUevum5a1vYYJ5Ia27UU=;
        b=bIIIraGORUqb4+uJxcqM1wvOdmCFY5tsLMRAVLLRQVVpQB9YMk9E5zUSq1IswQcnxn
         xueOm5toHpctHJqyaRnMVkuITMD5ZTgd5QW1xUZpoohtp0aBaGflaVoFceamjbO12ZZa
         pWrLmN9EYf+diVVZ05i1CyynbXB9Y3CBSYHdm6gvZsoTdtJKurqMtJ7NpL2O19tN2ZZQ
         KjYTGItLxbxhzWoDOOggl4y1UYZ++YaWmuWrJfW+RGlWU9HtHhdy2HO+ZzaTBuuOHR1N
         ZerrlU8IOwxgJmOuavPGna63xblRWeuIsaG56uBrNfqRnh+yWryL9W8oJUowjm08jW8c
         ZVIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmhnxOQYGjV8xfO2RUn55nmEwBztngNtXW2BF2+ye2xuvVmn591eAKZzfY/Z8TVq/oGbzKc
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.140.202 with SMTP id ri10mr25846419lbb.9.1391466020454;
 Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:20:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <16516.1391462981@thecus.kiddle.eu>
References: <CANWLQWsV5i+=3NptAxir6UYCoipFa2Pk+g6D1DDnMnJMVCbDgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130923213014.15f97f9e@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
	<3511.1390605547@thecus.kiddle.eu>
	<140125111530.ZM21792@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20140127124301.4144f2d9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<20140127161124.2aa16b37@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<2700.1390950035@thecus.kiddle.eu>
	<EA3D3D1C-A0E8-4DA0-B10D-5B428A02AB51@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
	<19068.1391204240@thecus.kiddle.eu>
	<19751.1391207572@thecus.kiddle.eu>
	<163F74F2-3FA8-4478-B354-491C006590C9@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
	<16516.1391462981@thecus.kiddle.eu>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:20:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH+w=7ZP1GzdJq3NgL0_X1sn22409353Atn+FDUwc=G=GrPMPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: zle: vi mode: wrong undo handling on fresh lines
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c25deaddd92904f187edd1

--001a11c25deaddd92904f187edd1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>
> It really ought to be possible to redefine complete-word. The following
> works with old-style completion but not with the new. Anyone have an
> idea why?
>
> complete-word() {
>   zle .complete-word
> }
> zle -N complete-word
>

The obvious reason is that "new completion" has already re-bound
complete-word to the _main_complete function.  You can't override the
.complete-word form, so you're always going to bypass new completion when
running "zle .complete-word".

The second possible problem is that you've changed complete-word from a
completion widget (defined with "zle -C") into a normal widget.  It mostly
works to call completion widgets from normal ones (though not the other way
around) but you have to be careful, and you might need to make calls to the
special auto-suffix-* widgets at the right times.

To get what I think you're after here, you'd more likely want

complete_word() {
  _main_complete "$@"
}
zle -C complete-word .complete-word complete-word

but I'm not certain.

--001a11c25deaddd92904f187edd1--