From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6475 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2011 05:31:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 29945 Received: (qmail 25060 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2011 05:31:23 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at brasslantern.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <87liqrlt6u.fsf@ding.tiker.net> Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:31:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Job management puzzle/bug? From: Bart Schaefer To: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Accidentally sent this just to Andreas, resending for zsh-workers] Apparently you shouldn't send multipart/signed mail to the zsh mailing lists. =A0Either the list server stripped off the first set of part headers, or something messed it up on your end, but either way I got a garbled message and had to dig the actual text out of the raw message in order to quote it here. On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote: > > here's a zsh behavior I don't understand: > > ^Z > [1] + 29395 suspended python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()' > $ kill %1 > $ jobs andreas@ding 20:01 > [1] + suspended python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()' > $ kill -9 %1 > kill: kill %1 failed: no matching process This is probably one of the interrelated bugs that were fixed by zsh-workers/29769 or 29677 or 29481. =A0Is it possible for you to try to reproduce this with zsh-4.3.13, released just this past week?