From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22238 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2018 20:39:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 43127 Received: (qmail 2683 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Jul 2018 20:39:00 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.215.47):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.77255 secs); 01 Jul 2018 20:39:00 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6c+TCVdskMn4mhfVlW13BPzPXMXDu+JHwDyH5m1i4DA=; b=iG9lGcFZrovOoA5Ln0XLi6EbRr15PjAm9zjV1Tg73gl0Nmo4KCtHsYGDUV36pZLWi0 +5MX0clySRlRDrsppxk+ya6wXI47eUnTaURd3GJpRyuTomz3/EoyllvndttmFgHVZDEv VXG7Zmm4lzkofpdRk4+sDZaLUGzJtKYwIlR0zVFNHzZNYvNf2WH31IH0UQNm7FH6F9jX VOtIXTs6QfxwRfTYwLABrcjKbP5Vu1XIcFCQrEcCw//DA/gEy9TNzwq75OUsBAqs4+9F kMjz1GubsBSaCro7gEg0fr3rZYEI6JtdkhCDn822rD8c/t5ZfsLRHctTYj6WG+t2/5Ri q9Eg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=6c+TCVdskMn4mhfVlW13BPzPXMXDu+JHwDyH5m1i4DA=; b=Xmii932KJStTxX6lDBB8kFBovyqfGrFP8PzOOwBLrfTSUfyM7YwxTUEUDZWliKOnP7 fHsk+nU7Gbsh0gjmkG++bat7W2EpQbVagLmOgDtVM71b+Lj3W2vyNFfoktneuhEQiuBm NdBGYOrCFTKkHm+nNKkWXgs5ZfmwM2PlwZylRK3wkk+ZgQAxENAlx/IXlwZtI2/fckYU cHp13tPwMUUFviSrO0S4H6m3dMdWZORNFjA71OpNU6EN+JlCWldkesLGFCx56zjh0EOa tXjtIv42l2YFbEsJDp+sqgde9qIiTnp10ZkJFHJJrhkmD3juylyqfJTSZ8YdAgle+sSq NcCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E275O6EDSrGesETTBCu/O/7ruq7j3/dIvNdIgRMJnG5WsSgUZfm ZNuDxVdZDXu4jPTSJKmV8X4bZHcRSRRF8ShLCsZLng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpe/W2NSoVEW9CQMBWdfERuk0aAywdJUPvkddg+Fq0tdb5S9aZzHWGs6gSPtNxJ05a4fxJVhilaiaD3BZ1amoPU= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c403:: with SMTP id u3-v6mr14211999lff.87.1530477533841; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 13:38:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Bart Schaefer Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 13:38:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Huge delay for completions when not sorting To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > I would have expected that the line > > zstyle ':completion:*' sort false > > speeds things up if there is a huge number of completions. > However, quite the opposite is true. This is probably a consequence of duplicate removal. It's a lot harder to search a single unsorted group for possible duplicates, even if there aren't any to find.